linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm8005,pm8998,pmi8998

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <152527857679.138124.10889204252669437850@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 02 May 2018 09:29:36 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for pm8005,pm8998,pmi8998

Quoting Doug Anderson (2018-04-23 22:26:29)
> 
> >  static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
> >         { .compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic", .data = (void *)COMMON_SUBTYPE },
> > @@ -54,7 +57,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id pmic_spmi_id_table[] = {
> >         { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994",   .data = (void *)PMI8994_SUBTYPE },
> >         { .compatible = "qcom,pm8916",    .data = (void *)PM8916_SUBTYPE },
> >         { .compatible = "qcom,pm8004",    .data = (void *)PM8004_SUBTYPE },
> > +       { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998",   .data = (void *)PMI8998_SUBTYPE },
> > +       { .compatible = "qcom,pm8005",    .data = (void *)PM8005_SUBTYPE },
> >         { .compatible = "qcom,pm8909",    .data = (void *)PM8909_SUBTYPE },
> > +       { .compatible = "qcom,pm8998",    .data = (void *)PM8998_SUBTYPE },
> 
> nit: It appears that the above table was previously sorted by SUBTYPE
> ID.  Could you perhaps move your 3 new PMICs to the bottom to maintain
> this?  Other than that, you can add my Reviewed-by if you would like
> (not that I have _any_ real expertise on SPMI, so might not be worth
> it).

Ok. I'll change the order and resend the patch with the reviewed-by
tags.