linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] seccomp: Don't special case audited processes when logging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLnD=g=LxR5KTrvcwr1qaYiYXbH-ersvhs5NPRR6JA91w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 May 2018 09:57:05 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Audit <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] seccomp: Don't special case audited processes when logging

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 8:53 AM, Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index da78835..9029d9d 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -584,18 +584,13 @@ static inline void seccomp_log(unsigned long syscall, long signr, u32 action,
>         }
>
>         /*
> -        * Force an audit message to be emitted when the action is RET_KILL_*,
> -        * RET_LOG, or the FILTER_FLAG_LOG bit was set and the action is
> -        * allowed to be logged by the admin.
> +        * Emit an audit message when the action is RET_KILL_*, RET_LOG, or the
> +        * FILTER_FLAG_LOG bit was set. The admin has the ability to silence
> +        * any action from being logged by removing the action name from the
> +        * seccomp_actions_logged sysctl.
>          */
>         if (log)
> -               return __audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);
> -
> -       /*
> -        * Let the audit subsystem decide if the action should be audited based
> -        * on whether the current task itself is being audited.
> -        */
> -       return audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);
> +               audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);
>  }

This whole series looks great to me. If I can get an Ack from Paul for
the audit bits, I can take it via the seccomp tree. One minor nit on
seccomp_log() above, I'd probably change this to show the "exception"
case as "out of line" of normal code flow. i.e. instead of "if (log)
audit_seccomp", invert it to return early:

...
    if (!log)
        return;

    audit_seccomp(syscall, signr, action);
}

But if there isn't some other need for a v3, I can just make this
change when I commit.

Thanks for fixing this up!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security