[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180503090652.GB5301@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 10:06:52 +0100
From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
To: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.daly@...el.com,
cunming.liang@...el.com, zhihong.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] virtio: support VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:59:55AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> This patch introduces the support for VIRTIO_F_IO_BARRIER.
> When this feature is negotiated, driver will use the barriers
> suitable for hardware devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
I should have thought of this earlier, but why is a new feature bit
necessary? If a hardware virtio device is in use, then the device
should already negotiate VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM (i.e. use DMA APIs and
IOMMU callbacks).
Does disabling weak_barriers when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM is set solve
the problem?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (456 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists