linux-kernel - Re: cpu stopper threads and load balancing leads to deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 16:44:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: cpu stopper threads and load balancing leads to deadlock

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 04:16:55PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 15:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 03:32:39PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > 
> > > Dang.  With $subject fix applied as well..
> > 
> > That's a NO then... :-(
> 
> Could say who cares about oddball offline wakeup stat. <cringe>

Yeah, nobody.. but I don't want to have to change the wakeup code to
deal with this if at all possible. That'd just add conditions that are
'always' false, except in this exceedingly rare circumstance.

So ideally we manage to tell RCU that it needs to pay attention while
we're doing this here thing, which is what I thought RCU_NONIDLE() was
about.