[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180503034529.GA16676@grmbl.mre>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 05:45:29 +0200
From: Amit Shah <amit@...tshah.net>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes
(apologies if you received a dup)
On (Tue) 24 Apr 2018 [21:41:29], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq.
> > Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while
> > going over it I saw that error handling is also broken -
> > failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail.
> >
> > Lightly tested.
>
> Amit - any feedback before I push these patches?
The changes look good spec-wise.
There are a bunch of tests in avocado-vt that test virtio-console
functionality. Can you give those a try before pushing?
Amit
--
http://amitshah.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists