lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180503182656.GB14956@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 12:26:56 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Lidong Chen <jemmy858585@...il.com>, dledford@...hat.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, qing.huang@...cle.com,
        artemyko@...lanox.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        adido@...lanox.com, galsha@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
        Lidong Chen <lidongchen@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/umem: use tgid instead of pid in ib_umem structure

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:12:35PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:04:34PM +0800, Lidong Chen wrote:
> > > The userspace may invoke ibv_reg_mr and ibv_dereg_mr by different threads.
> > > If when ibv_dereg_mr invoke and the thread which invoked ibv_reg_mr has
> > > exited, get_pid_task will return NULL, ib_umem_release does not decrease
> > > mm->pinned_vm. This patch fixes it by use tgid.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidongchen@...cent.com>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 12 ++++++------
> > >  include/rdma/ib_umem.h         |  2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > Why are we even using a struct pid for this? Does anyone know?
> >
> 
> Can it be related to "fork" support?

Not sure..

Ideally we want to hold the struct mm, but we can't hold it long
term, so pid is a surrogate for that.

> > I'm surprised that struct task isn't held in the struct ib_umem..
> >
> 
> I think that this code can be removed and all accesses to mm_struct can
> be done with "current->mm".

That sounds wrong for fork support, as the mm used in destroy MUST
exactly match the mm used in create..

How does this accounting work in fork anyhow?

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ