linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180503184607.GA21155@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 11:46:07 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sasha Levin <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches

On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:12:36PM +0000, Sasha Levin via Ksummit-discuss wrote:
> 
> For example, how about extending the release cycle until the amount of
> fixes for regressions introduced in the current merge window drops under
> a certain thershold? (so go to -rc20 if we need to).
> 
Reminds me of what happened at a previous employer. We had a hard rule that
a product shall not be released unless it has no more than 2 severe or
critical bugs. Solution: Stop testing 2-3 weeks ahead of the scheduled
release day.

Here: We don't want to see -rc20. Solution: Stop applying bug fixes
at -rcX.

Guenter