[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180503235446.6a3d3118@endymion>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 23:54:46 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Michel Dänzer
<michel@...nzer.net>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: Silent unwanted warning "buffer is full"
If DMA_ATTR_NO_WARN is passed to swiotlb_alloc_buffer(), it should be
passed further down to swiotlb_tbl_map_single(). Otherwise we escape
half of the warnings but still log the other half.
This is one of the multiple causes of spurious warnings reported at:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104082
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Fixes: 0176adb00406 ("swiotlb: refactor coherent buffer allocation")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.16
---
lib/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- linux-4.16.orig/lib/swiotlb.c 2018-05-02 15:06:49.677769532 +0200
+++ linux-4.16/lib/swiotlb.c 2018-05-03 15:04:27.136921225 +0200
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ swiotlb_alloc_buffer(struct device *dev,
phys_addr = swiotlb_tbl_map_single(dev,
swiotlb_phys_to_dma(dev, io_tlb_start),
- 0, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, 0);
+ 0, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, attrs);
if (phys_addr == SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR)
goto out_warn;
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists