lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 May 2018 06:06:50 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Yizhuo Zhai <yzhai003@....edu>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chengyu Song <csong@...ucr.edu>,
        Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@...ucr.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/exit.c: pointer sighand could be uninitialized

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 06:48:57PM -0700, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
> Variable 'sighand' could be uninitialized if probe_kernel_address fails
> (-EFAULT). The later use in the if statement may lead to undefined behavior.

Excuse me, but that's nonsense.  The value *copied* into it (in case
probe_kernel_address() has not failed) may be just as uninitialized.
If mere "compare uninitialized pointer value to NULL" can cause nasal demons to fly,
	* we are screwed anyway
	* the piece of crap compiler should be printed on sandpaper and used to
polish its authors.

Read the comments in there, please.  Especially the one regarding the second case.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ