[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180504005102.20717-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 17:51:02 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Dan Haab <dhaab@...ul.com>,
Dan Haab <riproute@...il.com>
Cc: Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: BCM5301X: Relicense most DTS files to the GPL 2.0+ / MIT
On Wed, 2 May 2018 16:11:02 +0200, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>
> These files were created and ever touched by a group of three people
> only: Dan, Hauke and me. They were licensed under GNU/GPL or ISC.
>
> Introducing and discussing SPDX-License-Identifier resulted in a
> conclusion that ISC is a not recommended license (see also a
> license-rules.rst). Moveover an old e-mail from Alan Cox was pointed
> which explained that dual licensing is a safer solution than depending
> on a common compatibility belief.
>
> This commit switches most of BCM5301X DTS files to dual licensing using:
> 1) GPL 2.0+ to make sure they are compatible with Linux kernel
> 2) MIT to allow sharing with more permissive projects
> Both licenses belong to the preferred ones (see LICENSES/preferred/).
>
> An attempt to relicense remaining files will be made separately and will
> require approve from more/other developers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> ---
Applied to devicetree/next, thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists