[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180504102958.u6c3mqackl4kzd54@um.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 13:29:58 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
peterz@...radead.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace
context switch
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:08:39PM +0800, Luwei Kang wrote:
> +static void pt_guest_enter(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +{
> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST || pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST)
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, vmx->pt_desc.host.ctl);
> +
> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST &&
> + vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) {
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, 0);
> + pt_save_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.host, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
> + pt_load_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.guest, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void pt_guest_exit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> +{
> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST &&
> + vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) {
> + pt_save_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.guest, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
> + pt_load_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.host, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
> + }
> +
> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST || pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST)
> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, vmx->pt_desc.host.ctl);
> +}
This means that a host PT event won't get the guest traces and won't get
any notification as to what'd happened or why. At the minimum we need to
send a PARTIAL AUX record at the pt_guest_enter(), when we turn the host
tracing off.
Regards,
--
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists