[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180504143617.5smet67tomygchuu@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 15:36:17 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dvyukov@...gle.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/core / kcov: avoid kcov_area during task switch
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:32:26PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 05/04/2018 04:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> > +#define kcov_prepare_switch(t) \
> > +do { \
> > + (t)->kcov_mode |= KCOV_IN_CTXSW; \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
> > +#define kcov_finish_switch(t) \
> > +do { \
> > + (t)->kcov_mode &= ~KCOV_IN_CTXSW; \
> > +} while (0)
> > +
>
> Why macros?
I can't use static inline functions without a circular include
dependency between <linux/sched.h> and <linux/kcov.h>, since the
definition of task_struct uses things defined in <linux/kcov.h>.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists