[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180504144014.5378-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 16:40:14 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Remove no longer required irqsave/restore
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Commit a841796f11c9 ("signal: align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and
RCU") introduced a rcu read side critical section with interrupts
disabled. The changelog suggested that a better long-term fix would be "to
make rt_mutex_unlock() disable irqs when acquiring the rt_mutex structure's
->wait_lock".
This long-term fix has been made in commit 4abf91047cf ("rtmutex: Make >
wait_lock irq safe") for different reason.
Therefore revert commit a841796f11c9 ("signal: align >
__lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU") as the interrupt disable
dance is not longer required.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/signal.c | 24 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index c6e4c83dc090..16b87c54d027 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1244,19 +1244,12 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
{
struct sighand_struct *sighand;
+ rcu_read_lock();
for (;;) {
- /*
- * Disable interrupts early to avoid deadlocks.
- * See rcu_read_unlock() comment header for details.
- */
- local_irq_save(*flags);
- rcu_read_lock();
sighand = rcu_dereference(tsk->sighand);
- if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- local_irq_restore(*flags);
+ if (unlikely(sighand == NULL))
break;
- }
+
/*
* This sighand can be already freed and even reused, but
* we rely on SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and sighand_ctor() which
@@ -1268,15 +1261,12 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
* __exit_signal(). In the latter case the next iteration
* must see ->sighand == NULL.
*/
- spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
- if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand)) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
+ if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand))
break;
- }
- spin_unlock(&sighand->siglock);
- rcu_read_unlock();
- local_irq_restore(*flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sighand->siglock, *flags);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return sighand;
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists