linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] IB/umem: use tgid instead of pid in ib

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <011606E7-9AE2-4250-A687-307C7D687FA9@tencent.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 May 2018 15:14:06 +0000
From:   lidongchen(陈立东) <lidongchen@...cent.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC:     858585 jemmy <jemmy858585@...il.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "qing.huang@...cle.com" <qing.huang@...cle.com>,
        "artemyko@...lanox.com" <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "adido@...lanox.com" <adido@...lanox.com>,
        Gal Shachaf <galsha@...lanox.com>,
        Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/umem: use tgid instead of pid in ib_umem structure



> 在 2018年5月4日，21:39，Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> 写道：
> 
>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:32:38PM +0800, 858585 jemmy wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 6:01 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:43:01PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:26:56PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:12:35PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 09:33:10AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 10:04:34PM +0800, Lidong Chen wrote:
>>>>>>>> The userspace may invoke ibv_reg_mr and ibv_dereg_mr by different threads.
>>>>>>>> If when ibv_dereg_mr invoke and the thread which invoked ibv_reg_mr has
>>>>>>>> exited, get_pid_task will return NULL, ib_umem_release does not decrease
>>>>>>>> mm->pinned_vm. This patch fixes it by use tgid.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <lidongchen@...cent.com>
>>>>>>>> drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c | 12 ++++++------
>>>>>>>> include/rdma/ib_umem.h         |  2 +-
>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Why are we even using a struct pid for this? Does anyone know?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can it be related to "fork" support?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Not sure..
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ideally we want to hold the struct mm, but we can't hold it long
>>>>> term, so pid is a surrogate for that.
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm surprised that struct task isn't held in the struct ib_umem..
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think that this code can be removed and all accesses to mm_struct can
>>>>>> be done with "current->mm".
>>>>> 
>>>>> That sounds wrong for fork support, as the mm used in destroy MUST
>>>>> exactly match the mm used in create..
>>>>> 
>>>>> How does this accounting work in fork anyhow?
>>>> 
>>>> We are not supporting fork, so this is why I proposed to remove it.
>>> 
>>> Er, the new kabi certainly can call reg and dereg across a fork
>> 
>> what is the expect behavior after fork?
>> I write a test code, the dereg just return EACCES in the child
>> process. and have no effect.
> 
> Did you do reg/dereg over write() interface? If yes, this is expected
> behaviour of "not-supported fork()". A couple of months/years ago, your
> test program would work, but we closed this option due to security
> constraints.

the parent process call ibv_reg_mr, and the child process call ibv_dereg_mr.

If fork is not supported now, so use tgid to get mm structure is fine for multithread.

> 
> Thanks
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Jason