[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180504203819.GF98604@atomide.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 13:38:19 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, sre@...nel.org, nekit1000@...il.com,
mpartap@....net, merlijn@...zup.org
Subject: Re: Motorola Droid 4 progress, power consumption
* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> [180504 20:22]:
> Hi!
>
> > > user@...uan:/sys/class/power_supply/battery$ date; cat current_now
> > > current_avg
> > > Thu May 3 09:33:07 CEST 2018
> > > -56000
> > > -72308
> > > user@...uan:/sys/class/power_supply/battery$ date; cat current_now
> > > current_avg
> > > Thu May 3 09:33:08 CEST 2018
> > > -37000
> > > -211362
> >
> > I recall it just being calculated based on the time between
> > the reads. Hard to say what it does, -ENODOCS.. Maybe the mc13783
> > PMIC docs have something similar.
>
> Hmm. current_avg is world readable; if it does changes to the
> hardware, that's somehow bad.
No it just calls cpcap_battery_cc_get_avg_current() that calculates
the average from last time it got sampled based on number of samples
collected between the two reads. Seems to match what I see on my
power supply here.
> But I guess I can sample charge_counter every minute or so and get
> what I need?
Not sure what the max time range is for the PMIC, but yeah I'd
assume once a minute is duoable. Maybe compare it to the chart
you already have?
> > > > Hmm oh and the POWER_SUPPLY_CHARGE_COUNTER value should be monitored
> > > > by your libbattery and it's low value and high value should be saved
> > > > to a file. Low should be saved when we get the battery low interrupt
> > > > and battery state changes to POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY_LEVEL_CRITICAL.
> > > > High value should be saved on POWER_SUPPLY_CAPACITY_LEVEL_FULL.
> > > >
> > > > Then when you know the high value and low value, you can calculate
> > > > the remaining capacity based on the current value and
> > > > POWER_SUPPLY_POWER_AVG.
> > >
> > > I'll look into that... but probably will do experiments with python,
> > > first.
> >
> > Sure. The reason why I think we should not do it in the kernel in
> > addition to the earlier reasoning is that we don't have a place
> > to store the min and max values across reboot. I think there's
> > some flash on the battery over 1w bus, but it probably just
> > contains battery serial number or something and is not intended
> > for writing much to it. I guess the min and max values should be
> > really keyd based on this battery id in case the battery gets
> > changed.
>
> I agree this should not be done in kernel as it requires persistent
> storage.
>
> Battery is not user-replacable (and this will recalibrate itself on
> charge/discharge cycle) so.. I don't think keying is strictly
> neccessary for D4.
Yeah right, that can be added later on if needed if you just
plan accordingly. It's replaceable with a T5 after you peel off the
sticker from the corners :)
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists