[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c339bc07-c852-cb76-6c65-393488bdfe7e@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 23:49:44 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
peterz@...radead.org, chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] KVM: x86: Implement Intel Processor Trace
context switch
On 04/05/2018 12:29, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:08:39PM +0800, Luwei Kang wrote:
>> +static void pt_guest_enter(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> +{
>> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST || pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST)
>> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, vmx->pt_desc.host.ctl);
>> +
>> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST &&
>> + vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) {
>> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, 0);
>> + pt_save_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.host, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
>> + pt_load_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.guest, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pt_guest_exit(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> +{
>> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST &&
>> + vmx->pt_desc.guest.ctl & RTIT_CTL_TRACEEN) {
>> + pt_save_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.guest, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
>> + pt_load_msr(&vmx->pt_desc.host, vmx->pt_desc.range_cnt);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST || pt_mode == PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST)
>> + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL, vmx->pt_desc.host.ctl);
>> +}
>
> This means that a host PT event won't get the guest traces and won't get
> any notification as to what'd happened or why. At the minimum we need to
> send a PARTIAL AUX record at the pt_guest_enter(), when we turn the host
> tracing off.
How do you do that? :)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists