[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180506225142-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 22:52:03 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit@...tshah.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@...el.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] virtio-console: spec compliance fixes
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) 03 May 2018 [22:28:32], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 05:45:29AM +0200, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > (apologies if you received a dup)
> > >
> > > On (Tue) 24 Apr 2018 [21:41:29], Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:17:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > Turns out virtio console tries to take a buffer out of an active vq.
> > > > > Works by sheer luck, and is explicitly forbidden by spec. And while
> > > > > going over it I saw that error handling is also broken -
> > > > > failure is easy to trigger if I force allocations to fail.
> > > > >
> > > > > Lightly tested.
> > > >
> > > > Amit - any feedback before I push these patches?
> > >
> > > The changes look good spec-wise.
> > >
> > > There are a bunch of tests in avocado-vt that test virtio-console
> > > functionality. Can you give those a try before pushing?
> > >
> > > Amit
> >
> > I pushed before I did that test, will try to find the time later. BTW
> > do you still want to be on the maintainers list?
>
> Yes, I want to be on the maintainers list; but won't mind
> co-maintainers. The recent changes seem to be spec-related, and I'd
> expect you to have a good handle on that anyway.
>
> Amit
If you can do extra testing that would be appreciated though.
> --
> http://amitshah.net/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists