linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180507073928.shmtfpqyhgxya53b@linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 7 May 2018 09:39:28 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Mike Galbraith <gleep@....de>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion

On 2018-05-06 12:59:19 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 12:26 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 May 2018, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
> > > 
> > > Shrug.  Lots of hobbyists have a beast in their basement, right?
> > 
> > This hardly qualifies as a proper changelog ...
> 
> Hm, that wasn't intended to be a changelog.
> 
> This patch may not be current either, I haven't tested RT on a UV box
> in quite some time.

That last hunk looks like something that would be required even for !RT. 
Would you mind to check that patch and write a changelog? If it doesn't
work for RT there is no need to carry this in -RT.

> 	-Mike

Sebastian