[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuJBw3MFvdju7MoLxcW8wJuBbhiXe_TQut2dw2_dpAVQZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 15:57:47 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>, chenhc@...ote.com,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"open list:RALINK MIPS ARCHITECTURE" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] MIPS: Convert update_persistent_clock() to update_persistent_clock64()
On 6 May 2018 at 11:04, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 3:07 AM, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Since struct timespec is not y2038 safe on 32bit machines, this patch
>> converts update_persistent_clock() to update_persistent_clock64() using
>> struct timespec64.
>>
>> The rtc_mips_set_time() and rtc_mips_set_mmss() interfaces were using
>> 'unsigned long' type that is not y2038 safe on 32bit machines, moreover
>> there is only one platform implementing rtc_mips_set_time() and two
>> platforms implementing rtc_mips_set_mmss(), so we can just make them each
>> implement update_persistent_clock64() directly, to get that helper out
>> of the common mips code by removing rtc_mips_set_time() and
>> rtc_mips_set_mmss() interfaces.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
>
> Looks good overall, but I still found a bug and one minor issue. With
> those fixed,
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/dec/time.c b/arch/mips/dec/time.c
>> index 9e992cf..934db6f 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/dec/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/dec/time.c
>> @@ -59,14 +59,15 @@ void read_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 *ts)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * In order to set the CMOS clock precisely, rtc_mips_set_mmss has to
>> + * In order to set the CMOS clock precisely, update_persistent_clock64 has to
>> * be called 500 ms after the second nowtime has started, because when
>> * nowtime is written into the registers of the CMOS clock, it will
>> * jump to the next second precisely 500 ms later. Check the Dallas
>> * DS1287 data sheet for details.
>> */
>> -int rtc_mips_set_mmss(unsigned long nowtime)
>> +int update_persistent_clock64(struct timespec64 now)
>> {
>> + time64_t nowtime = now.tv_sec;
>> int retval = 0;
>> int real_seconds, real_minutes, cmos_minutes;
>> unsigned char save_control, save_freq_select;
>
>
> It looks like you now get an invalid 64-bit division in here,
> you have to change it to either use div_u64_rem() or possibly
> time64_to_tm() or rtc_time64_to_tm() (the latter requires
> CONFIG_RTC_LIB).
I will use div_u64_rem() to calculate real_seconds and real_minutes.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/lasat/ds1603.c b/arch/mips/lasat/ds1603.c
>> index d75c887..061815e 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/lasat/ds1603.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/lasat/ds1603.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void rtc_write_byte(unsigned int byte)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static void rtc_write_word(unsigned long word)
>> +static void rtc_write_word(time64_t word)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>
> I would say this function should take a 'u32' argument (or keep the
> unsigned long) to match the name and implementation, but then have a
> type cast in the caller with a comment about the loss of range and overflow
> in y2106.
OK.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/lasat/sysctl.c b/arch/mips/lasat/sysctl.c
>> index 6f74224..76f7b62 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/lasat/sysctl.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/lasat/sysctl.c
>> @@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ int proc_dolasatrtc(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>> if (r)
>> return r;
>>
>> - if (write)
>> - rtc_mips_set_mmss(rtctmp);
>> + if (write) {
>> + ts.tv_sec = rtctmp;
>> + ts.tv_nsec = 0;
>> +
>> + update_persistent_clock64(ts);
>> + }
>>
> ... and probably also a comment here to explain that we can't actually use
> the full 64-bit range because of HW limits.
>
OK. Thanks for your comments.
--
Baolin.wang
Best Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists