linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI ACPI: Avoid panic when PCI IO resource's size is not page aligned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a8398da8-2f69-5694-69d6-224b547a378a@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 May 2018 16:06:13 +0800
From:   Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:     <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        <jcm@...hat.com>, <toshi.kani@....com>, <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
        <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI ACPI: Avoid panic when PCI IO resource's size
 is not page aligned



On 2018/5/1 17:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> > index 6fc204a..b758ca3 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> > @@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static void acpi_pci_root_remap_iospace(struct resource_entry *entry)
>> >  		goto err;
>> >  
>> >  	res->start = port;
>> > -	res->end = port + length - 1;
>> > +	res->end = PAGE_ALIGN(port + length) - 1;
> Shouldn't pci_remap_iospace() sanitize its arguments instead?

Yeah, I thought that pci_remap_iospace() will be called at many place, and presently I
had not seen any problem at other place except acpi_pci_root_remap_iospace(). Anyway,
sanitize arguments in pci_remap_iospace() can resolve the problem more thoroughly, but
should more common, right?

Therefore, is the follow change ok from your point of view?

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index e597655..8607298 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -3527,6 +3527,9 @@ int pci_remap_iospace(const struct resource *res, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
        if (res->end > IO_SPACE_LIMIT)
                return -EINVAL;

+       if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(vaddr) || !PAGE_ALIGNED(resource_size(res)))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
        return ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + resource_size(res), phys_addr,
                                  pgprot_device(PAGE_KERNEL));
 #else

Thanks
Yisheng

> 
>> >  	entry->offset = port - pci_addr;
>> >  
>> >  	if (pci_remap_iospace(res, cpu_addr) < 0)