[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3561479.qPIcrWnXEC@avalon>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 16:26:08 +0300
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
Jean-Christophe Trotin <jean-christophe.trotin@...com>,
Yasunari Takiguchi <Yasunari.Takiguchi@...y.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Are media drivers abusing of GFP_DMA? - was: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC NOTES] x86 ZONE_DMA love
Hi Mauro,
On Saturday, 5 May 2018 19:08:15 EEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> There was a recent discussion about the use/abuse of GFP_DMA flag when
> allocating memories at LSF/MM 2018 (see Luis notes enclosed).
>
> The idea seems to be to remove it, using CMA instead. Before doing that,
> better to check if what we have on media is are valid use cases for it, or
> if it is there just due to some misunderstanding (or because it was
> copied from some other code).
>
> Hans de Goede sent us today a patch stopping abuse at gspca, and I'm
> also posting today two other patches meant to stop abuse of it on USB
> drivers. Still, there are 4 platform drivers using it:
>
> $ git grep -l -E "GFP_DMA\\b" drivers/media/
> drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispstat.c
> drivers/media/platform/sti/bdisp/bdisp-hw.c
> drivers/media/platform/sti/hva/hva-mem.c
> drivers/media/spi/cxd2880-spi.c
>
> Could you please check if GFP_DMA is really needed there, or if it is
> just because of some cut-and-paste from some other place?
I started looking at that for the omap3isp driver but Sakari beat me at
submitting a patch. GFP_DMA isn't needed for omap3isp.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists