linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/7] cifs: smbd: Protect memory registration using RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180507222006.20781-5-longli@linuxonhyperv.com>
Date:   Mon,  7 May 2018 15:20:04 -0700
From:   Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com>
To:     Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] cifs: smbd: Protect memory registration using RCU

From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>

Unlike packet I/O sending path, the memory registration is not locked. They
need to be protected when doing transport reconnect or shutdown.

It's not necessary to lock for memory deregistration, since at the time the
transport is already destroyed so it's impossible to pick up the wrong
transport.

Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
---
 fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c   | 6 ++++++
 fs/cifs/smbdirect.c | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
index 8cd164e..09ca098 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c
@@ -2609,10 +2609,13 @@ smb2_new_read_req(void **buf, unsigned int *total_len,
 		bool need_invalidate =
 			io_parms->tcon->ses->server->dialect == SMB30_PROT_ID;
 
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		rcu_dereference(server->smbd_conn);
 		rdata->mr = smbd_register_mr(
 				server->smbd_conn, rdata->pages,
 				rdata->nr_pages, rdata->tailsz,
 				true, need_invalidate);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		if (!rdata->mr)
 			return -ENOBUFS;
 
@@ -2986,10 +2989,13 @@ smb2_async_writev(struct cifs_writedata *wdata,
 		struct smbd_buffer_descriptor_v1 *v1;
 		bool need_invalidate = server->dialect == SMB30_PROT_ID;
 
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		rcu_dereference(server->smbd_conn);
 		wdata->mr = smbd_register_mr(
 				server->smbd_conn, wdata->pages,
 				wdata->nr_pages, wdata->tailsz,
 				false, need_invalidate);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		if (!wdata->mr) {
 			rc = -ENOBUFS;
 			goto async_writev_out;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
index 74620f5..8c46898 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smbdirect.c
@@ -1482,6 +1482,9 @@ void smbd_destroy(struct TCP_Server_Info *server)
 
 	info->transport_status = SMBD_DESTROYED;
 
+	rcu_assign_pointer(server->smbd_conn, NULL);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+
 	destroy_workqueue(info->workqueue);
 	kfree(info);
 }
-- 
2.7.4