[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAFQd5CvBv4hkE=PSHBJTYa9Lj0SyggxpMBEAYD=if0=T0uzHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 06:13:27 +0000
From: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
To: baruch@...s.co.il
Cc: Jacob Chen <jacob-chen@...wrt.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
钟以崇 <zyc@...k-chips.com>,
Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@...il.com>,
Jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Chen Jacob <jacob2.chen@...k-chips.com>,
陈城 <cc@...k-chips.com>,
Allon Huang <allon.huang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/17] media: rkisp1: add Rockchip ISP1 subdev driver
Hi Baruch,
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:09 PM Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
> Hi Jacob,
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:47:55PM +0800, Jacob Chen wrote:
> > +static int rkisp1_isp_sd_s_power(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int on)
> > +{
> > + struct rkisp1_device *isp_dev = sd_to_isp_dev(sd);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + v4l2_dbg(1, rkisp1_debug, &isp_dev->v4l2_dev, "s_power: %d\n",
on);
> > +
> > + if (on) {
> > + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(isp_dev->dev);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + rkisp1_config_clk(isp_dev);
> > + } else {
> > + ret = pm_runtime_put(isp_dev->dev);
> I commented this line out to make more than one STREAMON work. Otherwise,
the
> second STREAMON hangs. I guess the bug is not this driver. Probably
something
> in drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c. Just noting that in case you or
someone
> on Cc would like to investigate it further.
> I tested v4.16-rc4 on the Tinkerboard.
Looks like that version doesn't include the IOMMU PM and clock handling
rework [1], which should fix a lot of runtime PM issues. FWIW, linux-next
seems to already include it.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/23/44
Best regards,
Tomasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists