[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8fef316f-85d0-0bd4-4bbe-2d8330dfe2ec@ispras.ru>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 22:16:31 +0300
From: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, sil2review@...ts.osadl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: ltc2941-battery-gauge: Release device_node
in ltc294x_i2c_probe()
Hi,
On 01.05.2018 15:39, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 01:35:55AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>> There is of_node_get(client->dev.of_node) in ltc294x_i2c_probe(),
>> but these is no of_node_put() somethere in the driver.
>>
>> The patch adds one on error and normal paths.
>>
>> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
>
> That is ugly. Let's replace of_property_read_u32(np, ...) with
> device_property_read_u32(dev, ...) and get rid of np instead.
>
Ok, I will prepare v2.
What is the right way to replace
info->supply_desc.name = np->name;
?
If lifetime of 'client->dev.of_node' = 'np' cannot be less than lifetime
of 'client->dev', should we use just
info->supply_desc.name = client->dev.of_node->name;
?
Thank you,
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists