lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 08 May 2018 13:15:07 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        Odelu Kukatla <okukatla@...eaurora.org>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Add QCOM video clock controller driver

Quoting Rob Herring (2018-05-08 05:48:07)
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > On 2018-05-07 22:41, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:16:53PM +0530, Amit Nischal wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 2018-05-04 22:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-03 05:35:23)
> >>> > > Changes in v1:
> >>> > >    https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/24/545
> >>> > > Addressed below review comments given by Rob
> >>> > > - Change the compatible property as per '<vendor>,<soc>-<block>'
> >>> > > format.
> >>> > > - Add header definitions for resets and power-domain cells.
> >>> >
> >>> > You didn't add any reset definitions though?
> >>>
> >>> We haven't added the reset definitions for videocc as there is no
> >>> video reset client.
> >>
> >>
> >> So? You don't know what resets there are?
> >>
> >
> > We know the resets, but video driver doesn't do any block resets
> > prior to accessing the video subsystem so that's the reason we do
> > not want to expose the resets in videocc driver.
> 
> Bindings don't have to match what drivers currently use but should be
> complete as possible.

Right. Please add the #defines in the header file for the resets. You
can leave them out of the driver if you really want to, but typically we
still add them and then rely on not touching them if they shouldn't be
used.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ