| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <562873bf-075c-f148-c528-dddf188113c2@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 11:09:18 +0800
From: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...cle.com>
To: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>,
monis@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvmet,rxe: defer ip datagram sending to tasklet
On 2018/5/8 4:58, Alexandru Moise wrote:
> This addresses 3 separate problems:
>
> 1. When using NVME over Fabrics we may end up sending IP
> packets in interrupt context, we should defer this work
> to a tasklet.
>
> [ 50.939957] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 0 at kernel/softirq.c:161 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x1f/0xa0
> [ 50.942602] CPU: 3 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/3 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 4.17.0-rc3-ARCH+ #104
> [ 50.945466] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
> [ 50.948163] RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x1f/0xa0
> [ 50.949631] RSP: 0018:ffff88009c183900 EFLAGS: 00010006
> [ 50.951029] RAX: 0000000080010403 RBX: 0000000000000200 RCX: 0000000000000001
> [ 50.952636] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000200 RDI: ffffffff817e04ec
> [ 50.954278] RBP: ffff88009c183910 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000614
> [ 50.956000] R10: ffffea00021d5500 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff817e04ec
> [ 50.957779] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88009566f400 R15: ffff8800956c7000
> [ 50.959402] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88009c180000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 50.961552] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 50.963798] CR2: 000055c4ec0ccac0 CR3: 0000000002209001 CR4: 00000000000606e0
> [ 50.966121] Call Trace:
> [ 50.966845] <IRQ>
> [ 50.967497] __dev_queue_xmit+0x62d/0x690
> [ 50.968722] dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x20
> [ 50.969894] neigh_resolve_output+0x173/0x190
> [ 50.971244] ip_finish_output2+0x2b8/0x370
> [ 50.972527] ip_finish_output+0x1d2/0x220
> [ 50.973785] ? ip_finish_output+0x1d2/0x220
> [ 50.975010] ip_output+0xd4/0x100
> [ 50.975903] ip_local_out+0x3b/0x50
> [ 50.976823] rxe_send+0x74/0x120
> [ 50.977702] rxe_requester+0xe3b/0x10b0
> [ 50.978881] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0xd1/0xe0
> [ 50.980260] rxe_do_task+0x85/0x100
> [ 50.981386] rxe_run_task+0x2f/0x40
> [ 50.982470] rxe_post_send+0x51a/0x550
> [ 50.983591] nvmet_rdma_queue_response+0x10a/0x170
> [ 50.985024] __nvmet_req_complete+0x95/0xa0
> [ 50.986287] nvmet_req_complete+0x15/0x60
> [ 50.987469] nvmet_bio_done+0x2d/0x40
> [ 50.988564] bio_endio+0x12c/0x140
> [ 50.989654] blk_update_request+0x185/0x2a0
> [ 50.990947] blk_mq_end_request+0x1e/0x80
> [ 50.991997] nvme_complete_rq+0x1cc/0x1e0
> [ 50.993171] nvme_pci_complete_rq+0x117/0x120
> [ 50.994355] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x15e/0x180
> [ 50.995988] blk_mq_complete_request+0x6f/0xa0
> [ 50.997304] nvme_process_cq+0xe0/0x1b0
> [ 50.998494] nvme_irq+0x28/0x50
> [ 50.999572] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0xa2/0x1c0
> [ 51.000986] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x32/0x80
> [ 51.002356] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x60
> [ 51.003463] handle_edge_irq+0x1c9/0x200
> [ 51.004473] handle_irq+0x23/0x30
> [ 51.005363] do_IRQ+0x46/0xd0
> [ 51.006182] common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
> [ 51.007129] </IRQ>
>
> 2. Work must always be offloaded to tasklet when using NVMEoF in order to
> solve lock ordering between neigh->ha_lock seqlock and the nvme queue lock:
>
> [ 77.833783] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 77.833783]
> [ 77.835831] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 77.837129] ---- ----
> [ 77.838313] lock(&(&n->ha_lock)->seqcount);
> [ 77.839550] local_irq_disable();
> [ 77.841377] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
> [ 77.843222] lock(&(&n->ha_lock)->seqcount);
> [ 77.845178] <Interrupt>
> [ 77.846298] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
> [ 77.847986]
> [ 77.847986] *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 3. Same goes for the lock ordering between sch->q.lock and nvme queue lock:
>
> [ 47.634271] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 47.634271]
> [ 47.636452] CPU0 CPU1
> [ 47.637861] ---- ----
> [ 47.639285] lock(&(&sch->q.lock)->rlock);
> [ 47.640654] local_irq_disable();
> [ 47.642451] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
> [ 47.644521] lock(&(&sch->q.lock)->rlock);
> [ 47.646480] <Interrupt>
> [ 47.647263] lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
> [ 47.648492]
> [ 47.648492] *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> Using NVMEoF after this patch seems to finally be stable, without it,
> rxe eventually deadlocks the whole system and causes RCU stalls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@...il.com>
> ---
> v2->v3: Abandoned the idea of just offloading work to tasklet in irq
> context. NVMEoF needs the work to always be offloaded in order to
> function. I am unsure how large an impact this has on other rxe users.
>
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> index 2cb52fd48cf1..564453060c54 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_verbs.c
> @@ -761,7 +761,6 @@ static int rxe_post_send_kernel(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> unsigned int mask;
> unsigned int length = 0;
> int i;
> - int must_sched;
>
> while (wr) {
> mask = wr_opcode_mask(wr->opcode, qp);
> @@ -791,14 +790,7 @@ static int rxe_post_send_kernel(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> wr = wr->next;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Must sched in case of GSI QP because ib_send_mad() hold irq lock,
> - * and the requester call ip_local_out_sk() that takes spin_lock_bh.
> - */
> - must_sched = (qp_type(qp) == IB_QPT_GSI) ||
> - (queue_count(qp->sq.queue) > 1);
> -
> - rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, must_sched);
> + rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
> if (unlikely(qp->req.state == QP_STATE_ERROR))
> rxe_run_task(&qp->comp.task, 1);
>
> @@ -822,7 +814,7 @@ static int rxe_post_send(struct ib_qp *ibqp, struct ib_send_wr *wr,
>
> if (qp->is_user) {
> /* Utilize process context to do protocol processing */
> - rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 0);
> + rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 1);
Hi,
From your description, it seems that all the problems are caused by
NVME kernel.
Am I correct?
It seems that this block handles process context. If we keep
"rxe_run_task(&qp->req.task, 0);",
Do all the problems still occur?
Zhu Yanjun
> return 0;
> } else
> return rxe_post_send_kernel(qp, wr, bad_wr);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists