lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2018 08:43:51 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: imx: dma_unmap_sg buffers on shutdown

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 11:36:10PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> This properly unmaps DMA SG on device shutdown.
> 
> Reported-by: Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>
> Suggested-by: Nandor Han <nandor.han@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/imx.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 3ca767b1162a..6c53e74244ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -1425,10 +1425,18 @@ static void imx_uart_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
>  	u32 ucr1, ucr2;
>  
>  	if (sport->dma_is_enabled) {
> -		sport->dma_is_rxing = 0;
> -		sport->dma_is_txing = 0;
>  		dmaengine_terminate_sync(sport->dma_chan_tx);
> +		if (sport->dma_is_txing) {
> +			dma_unmap_sg(sport->port.dev, &sport->tx_sgl[0],
> +				     sport->dma_tx_nents, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +			sport->dma_is_txing = 0;
> +		}

did you find this because the kernel crashed or consumed more and more
memory, or is this "only" a finding of reading the source code? If the
former it would be great to point out in the commit log, if the latter,
I wonder if this is a real problem that warrants a stable backport.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ