lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2018 14:47:38 +0800
From:   Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        fthain@...egraphics.com.au, joe@...ches.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: 8390: Fix possible data races in __ei_get_stats



On 2018/5/8 13:04, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2018 07:16 PM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>> Yes, "&dev->stats" will not change, because it is a fixed address.
>> But the field data in "dev->stats" is changed (rx_frame_errors, rx_crc_errors and rx_missed_errors).
>> So if the driver returns "&dev->stats" without lock protection (like on line 858), the field data value of this return value can be the changed field data value or unchanged field data value.
>
> We do not care.
>
> This function can be called by multiple cpus at the same time.
>
> As soon as one cpu returns from it, another cpu can happily modify dev->stats.ANYFIELD.
>
> Your patch fixes nothing at all.
>

Okay, thanks.
I also find that my patch does not work...


Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ