[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <903e7c20-fdd7-9cbf-debb-a90e70240c7c@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 08:59:34 +0200
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, okaya@...eaurora.org
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038
(issued 65284 msec ago)
Dear Bjorn,
Am 07.05.2018 um 23:33 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:33:27AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> commit b0d6f2230e12c85ae3b65a854a53c67c7c1f6406
>> Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> Date: Thu May 3 18:39:38 2018 -0500
>>
>> PCI: pciehp: Add quirk for Intel Command Completed erratum
>>
>> The Intel CF118 erratum means the controller does not set the Command
>> Completed bit unless writes to the Slot Command register change "Control"
>> bits. Command Completed is never set for writes that only change software
>> notification "Enable" bits. This results in timeouts like this:
>>
>> pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Timeout on hotplug command 0x1038 (issued 65284 msec ago)
>>
>> When this erratum is present, avoid these timeouts by marking commands
>> "completed" immediately unless they change the "Control" bits.
>>
>> Here's the text of the erratum from the Intel document:
>>
>> CF118 PCIe Slot Status Register Command Completed bit not always
>> updated on any configuration write to the Slot Control
>> Register
>>
>> Problem: For PCIe root ports (devices 0 - 10) supporting hot-plug,
>> the Slot Status Register (offset AAh) Command Completed
>> (bit[4]) status is updated under the following condition:
>> IOH will set Command Completed bit after delivering the new
>> commands written in the Slot Controller register (offset
>> A8h) to VPP. The IOH detects new commands written in Slot
>> Control register by checking the change of value for Power
>> Controller Control (bit[10]), Power Indicator Control
>> (bits[9:8]), Attention Indicator Control (bits[7:6]), or
>> Electromechanical Interlock Control (bit[11]) fields. Any
>> other configuration writes to the Slot Control register
>> without changing the values of these fields will not cause
>> Command Completed bit to be set.
>>
>> The PCIe Base Specification Revision 2.0 or later describes
>> the “Slot Control Register” in section 7.8.10, as follows
>> (Reference section 7.8.10, Slot Control Register, Offset
>> 18h). In hot-plug capable Downstream Ports, a write to the
>> Slot Control register must cause a hot-plug command to be
>> generated (see Section 6.7.3.2 for details on hot-plug
>> commands). A write to the Slot Control register in a
>> Downstream Port that is not hotplug capable must not cause a
>> hot-plug command to be executed.
>>
>> The PCIe Spec intended that every write to the Slot Control
>> Register is a command and expected a command complete status
>> to abstract the VPP implementation specific nuances from the
>> OS software. IOH PCIe Slot Control Register implementation
>> is not fully conforming to the PCIe Specification in this
>> respect.
>>
>> Implication: Software checking on the Command Completed status after
>> writing to the Slot Control register may time out.
>>
>> Workaround: Software can read the Slot Control register and compare the
>> existing and new values to determine if it should check the
>> Command Completed status after writing to the Slot Control
>> register.
>>
>> Link: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e7-v2-spec-update.html
>> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8770820b-85a0-172b-7230-3a44524e6c9f@molgen.mpg.de
>> Reported-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-pci@...gen.mpg.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>
> I applied this with Paul's tested-by on pci/hotplug for v4.18.
Thank you very much. Will this also be picked up by the stable Linux
kernel series?
[…]
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists