[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180508070153.GX2285@localhost>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:01:53 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"H . Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] gnss: add new GNSS subsystem
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:06:44PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> >> I have one concern, though. While providing raw data by
> >> default is fine generally, it is a problem with device
> >> auto-discovery. I think there should be some IOCTL from
> >> the start, that can be used to inform userspace about
> >> the raw protocol being used (i.e. "NMEA"). I fear, that
> >> userspace may start to just assume raw = NMEA without
> >> having this (especially since all initial drivers provide
> >> NMEA).
> >
> > One problem I see here would be that the driver does not necessarily
> > know either what protocol is currently being used. Some devices have
> > boot-pins which can be used to configure the initial protocol used (and
> > this could perhaps be reflected in DT), but this can often later be
> > changed (by user space) and even be made persistent using battery-backed
> > ram or eeproms.
> >
> > Also note that at least u-blox devices supports having more than one
> > protocol active on the same port...
>
> as long as userspace can determine that it is GNSS hardware and what
> hardware it is, then you deal with the rest in userspace.
Yeah, I think that will do for now.
Thanks,
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists