[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d37e074d-5e8c-84e8-5833-7ff595e6348c@monom.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:18:44 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: sh-sci: Use spin_{try}lock_irqsave instead of
open coding version
Hi Sebastian,
On 05/07/2018 02:51 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-05-04 18:30:41 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c
>> @@ -2890,16 +2890,16 @@ static void serial_console_write(struct console *co, const char *s,
>> unsigned long flags;
>> int locked = 1;
>>
>> - local_irq_save(flags);
>> #if defined(SUPPORT_SYSRQ)
>> - if (port->sysrq)
>> + if (port->sysrq) {
>> locked = 0;
>> - else
>> + local_irq_save(flags);
>
> how is this helping? You should see a splat after a sysrq request.
You are right, I didn't really think this through.
Should 'echo t > /proc/sysrq' trigger the splat? At least I was so naive
that think it would be enough.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists