linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nubus: Unconditionally register bus type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180508074155.GA8561@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2018 09:41:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
        Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
        Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nubus: Unconditionally register bus type

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:07:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:51:12AM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >> >> the BUG() was triggered by loading a Mac Nubus network card module on
> >> >> a multiplatform kernel running on an Amiga machine. Up to Finn's Nubus
> >> >> core rewrite (this February), we've seen no errors. Since then, Nubus
> >> >> drivers fail to register because the Nubus bus is only registered on
> >> >> Macs.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can't see link order involved here at all.
> >> >
> >> > The link order is totally involved here :)
> >> >
> >> > Link order determines the order in which init calls are run, so you need
> >> > to ensure that your bus code comes before any drivers that use that bus
> >> > code in link order.  That way, at init time, your bus is created first,
> >> > preventing this type of error to happen.
> >>
> >> The issue here is not due to link ordering, but due to the bus not being
> >> registered on a system that doesn't have that particular bus.
> >
> > But how can that happen if the bus code is not present in the system at
> > that point in time?  Hardware doesn't matter at all here.
> 
> The bus code is present in the system.
> The bus is just not registered by the NuBus bus driver if the hardware
> doesn't have a NuBus host.

Ah, that sounds like some "tight" coupling that other bus cores do not
have.  That's the confusion here that I have, sorry.

> >> Akin to booting a kernel on an old PC without PCI, and loading a driver
> >> module for a PCI network card. I guess that doesn't crash (because no one
> >> has a PC without PCI anymore? ;-)
> >
> > No, it should work just fine, try it!  :)
> >
> > The driver will not bind to anything, but the bus code should work
> > properly, as long as it is initialized before the driver tries to
> > register with that specific bus type.
> 
> Hence the NuBus bus code should register the bus irregardless of the
> presence of the NuBus host hardware.

Yes it should.  Shouldn't cause any problems as long as you don't have
any hardware specific code in your bus code.  Because of this, I don't
think the original patch would help at all here, as the error would
still be the same.

So add a "is bus registered" flag to your bus and all should be fine.

thanks,

greg k-h