[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180508073929.113393774@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 10:10:06 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, DaeRyong Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 08/52] ALSA: aloop: Add missing cable lock to ctl API callbacks
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
commit 76b3421b39bd610546931fc923edcf90c18fa395 upstream.
Some control API callbacks in aloop driver are too lazy to take the
loopback->cable_lock and it results in possible races of cable access
while it's being freed. It eventually lead to a UAF, as reported by
fuzzer recently.
This patch covers such control API callbacks and add the proper mutex
locks.
Reported-by: DaeRyong Jeong <threeearcat@...il.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
sound/drivers/aloop.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/drivers/aloop.c
+++ b/sound/drivers/aloop.c
@@ -831,9 +831,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_shift_get(struc
{
struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].rate_shift;
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -865,9 +867,11 @@ static int loopback_notify_get(struct sn
{
struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].notify;
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -879,12 +883,14 @@ static int loopback_notify_put(struct sn
int change = 0;
val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] ? 1 : 0;
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
if (val != loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].notify) {
loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].notify = val;
change = 1;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
return change;
}
@@ -892,15 +898,18 @@ static int loopback_active_get(struct sn
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
{
struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
- struct loopback_cable *cable = loopback->cables
- [kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1];
+ struct loopback_cable *cable;
+
unsigned int val = 0;
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
+ cable = loopback->cables[kcontrol->id.subdevice][kcontrol->id.device ^ 1];
if (cable != NULL) {
unsigned int running = cable->running ^ cable->pause;
val = (running & (1 << SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) ? 1 : 0;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = val;
return 0;
}
@@ -943,9 +952,11 @@ static int loopback_rate_get(struct snd_
{
struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].rate;
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -965,9 +976,11 @@ static int loopback_channels_get(struct
{
struct loopback *loopback = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
+ mutex_lock(&loopback->cable_lock);
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] =
loopback->setup[kcontrol->id.subdevice]
[kcontrol->id.device].channels;
+ mutex_unlock(&loopback->cable_lock);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists