[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180508113431.GA12019@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 13:34:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] staging: ks7010: Move from bool to int in structs
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 03:03:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Fixes checkpatch.pl warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> index 628171091786..43090922daff 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ void hostif_mib_get_confirm(struct ks_wlan_private *priv)
> case DOT11_MAC_ADDRESS:
> hostif_sme_enqueue(priv, SME_GET_MAC_ADDRESS);
> ether_addr_copy(priv->eth_addr, priv->rxp);
> - priv->mac_address_valid = true;
> + priv->mac_address_valid = 1;
Wait, why? This should be bool, not an int. Why would checkpatch say
this is incorrect?
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists