linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Expose CLDEMOTE CPU feature to guest VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <09D68D4CF52CAF489B702DEBDD12D3D35269A68D@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2018 02:03:14 +0000
From:   "Liu, Jingqi" <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Expose CLDEMOTE CPU feature to guest VM

Hi Paolo,
Thanks. 
Will you help to modify the Signed-off-by chain ?
Or do I need to submit the second version after modifying the Signed-off-by chain ?

Thanks,
Jingqi Liu
-----Original Message-----
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonzini@...hat.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 12:30 AM
To: Liu, Jingqi <jingqi.liu@...el.com>; kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rkrcmar@...hat.com; tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; hpa@...or.com; x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Wang, Wei W <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Expose CLDEMOTE CPU feature to guest VM

On 04/05/2018 05:55, Jingqi Liu wrote:
> The CLDEMOTE instruction hints to hardware that the cache line that 
> contains the linear address should be moved("demoted") from the 
> cache(s) closest to the processor core to a level more distant from 
> the processor core. This may accelerate subsequent accesses to the 
> line by other cores in the same coherence domain, especially if the 
> line was written by the core that demotes the line.
> 
> This patch exposes the cldemote feature to the guest.
> 
> The release document ref below link:
> https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/\
> architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.pdf
> This patch has a dependency on https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/23/928
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>

Thanks.  Note that the Signed-off-by chain for the patch looks strange, the submitter should be the last (because it is a chain).

In the meanwhile, Ingo, Thomas, would it be possible to get a topic branch for that patch ("[PATCH] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate cldemote instruction")?

Thanks,

Paolo


> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c index 
> 82055b9..72d8c49 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
>  	const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_ecx_x86_features =
>  		F(AVX512VBMI) | F(LA57) | F(PKU) | 0 /*OSPKE*/ |
>  		F(AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ) | F(UMIP) | F(AVX512_VBMI2) | F(GFNI) |
> -		F(VAES) | F(VPCLMULQDQ) | F(AVX512_VNNI) | F(AVX512_BITALG);
> +		F(VAES) | F(VPCLMULQDQ) | F(AVX512_VNNI) | F(AVX512_BITALG) |
> +		F(CLDEMOTE);
>  
>  	/* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
>  	const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
>