[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <462ea6c6f62f5480f17ce7bf81ff5db1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 10:16:16 -0600
From: ilina@...eaurora.org
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
rnayak@...eaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sboyd@...nel.org,
evgreen@...omium.org, dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh-rsc: write sleep/wake
requests to TCS
On 2018-05-03 15:35, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> Hi Lina,
>
> On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:37:44PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> Sleep and wake requests are sent when the application processor
>> subsystem of the SoC is entering deep sleep states like in suspend.
>> These requests help lower the system power requirements when the
>> resources are not in use.
>>
>> Sleep and wake requests are written to the TCS slots but are not
>> triggered at the time of writing. The TCS are triggered by the
>> firmware
>> after the last of the CPUs has executed its WFI. Since these requests
>> may come in different batches of requests, it is the job of this
>> controller driver to find and arrange the requests into the available
>> TCSes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v7:
>> - Bug fix in find_match()
>> ---
>> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h | 8 +++
>> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c | 118
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
>> b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
>> index d9a21726e568..6e19fe458c31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-internal.h
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>> #define MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS 16
>> #define MAX_TCS_PER_TYPE 3
>> #define MAX_TCS_NR (MAX_TCS_PER_TYPE * TCS_TYPE_NR)
>> +#define MAX_TCS_SLOTS (MAX_CMDS_PER_TCS * MAX_TCS_PER_TYPE)
>> #define RPMH_MAX_CTRLR 2
>>
>> struct rsc_drv;
>> @@ -30,6 +31,8 @@ struct rsc_drv;
>> * @ncpt: number of commands in each TCS
>> * @lock: lock for synchronizing this TCS writes
>> * @req: requests that are sent from the TCS
>> + * @cmd_cache: flattened cache of cmds in sleep/wake TCS
>> + * @slots: indicates which of @cmd_addr are occupied
>> */
>> struct tcs_group {
>> struct rsc_drv *drv;
>> @@ -40,6 +43,8 @@ struct tcs_group {
>> int ncpt;
>> spinlock_t lock;
>> const struct tcs_request *req[MAX_TCS_PER_TYPE];
>> + u32 *cmd_cache;
>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(slots, MAX_TCS_SLOTS);
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -69,6 +74,9 @@ struct rsc_drv {
>> extern struct list_head rsc_drv_list;
>>
>> int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv, const struct tcs_request
>> *msg);
>> +int rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(struct rsc_drv *drv,
>> + const struct tcs_request *msg);
>> +int rpmh_rsc_invalidate(struct rsc_drv *drv);
>>
>> void rpmh_tx_done(const struct tcs_request *msg, int r);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> index 33270b1d5991..4e2144a14c31 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh-rsc.c
>> @@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ static struct tcs_group *get_tcs_for_msg(struct
>> rsc_drv *drv,
>> case RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE:
>> type = ACTIVE_TCS;
>> break;
>> + case RPMH_WAKE_ONLY_STATE:
>> + type = WAKE_TCS;
>> + break;
>> + case RPMH_SLEEP_STATE:
>> + type = SLEEP_TCS;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> }
>> @@ -353,6 +359,105 @@ int rpmh_rsc_send_data(struct rsc_drv *drv,
>> const struct tcs_request *msg)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_rsc_send_data);
>>
>> +static int find_match(const struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct
>> tcs_cmd *cmd,
>> + int len)
>> +{
>> + int i, j;
>> +
>> + /* Check for already cached commands */
>> + for_each_set_bit(i, tcs->slots, MAX_TCS_SLOTS) {
>> + if (tcs->cmd_cache[i] != cmd[0].addr)
>> + continue;
>> + for (j = 0; j < len; j++) {
>> + if (tcs->cmd_cache[i + j] != cmd[j].addr) {
>
> As mentioned in the review of v6, the code could read memory beyond
> tcs->cmd_cache if 'i + len > ARRAY_SIZE(tcs->cmd_cache)'
>
Ok. Will add it.
>> + WARN(1, "Message does not match previous sequence.\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return i;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return -ENODATA;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int find_slots(struct tcs_group *tcs, const struct tcs_request
>> *msg,
>> + int *tcs_id, int *cmd_id)
>
> The change from m/n => tcs_id/cmd_id in v7 greatly improves
> readability, thanks!
>
> Matthias
>
> PS: Please remember to include reviewers of earlier revisions to cc:
Sure.
Thanks,
Lina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists