[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180509155511.9bb3de08b33d617559e5fb3a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 15:55:11 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: vdavydov.dev@...il.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, pombredanne@...b.com, stummala@...eaurora.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, guro@...com,
mka@...omium.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, longman@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, jbacik@...com,
linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/13] mm: Assign id to every memcg-aware shrinker
On Wed, 09 May 2018 14:56:55 +0300 Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> The patch introduces shrinker::id number, which is used to enumerate
> memcg-aware shrinkers. The number start from 0, and the code tries
> to maintain it as small as possible.
>
> This will be used as to represent a memcg-aware shrinkers in memcg
> shrinkers map.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -248,6 +248,9 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
> s->s_time_gran = 1000000000;
> s->cleancache_poolid = CLEANCACHE_NO_POOL;
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MEMCG) && !defined(CONFIG_SLOB)
It would be more conventional to do this logic in Kconfig - define a
new MEMCG_SHRINKER which equals MEMCG && !SLOB.
This ifdef occurs a distressing number of times in the patchset :( I
wonder if there's something we can do about that.
Also, why doesn't it work with slob? Please describe the issue in the
changelogs somewhere.
It's a pretty big patchset. I *could* merge it up in the hope that
someone is planning do do a review soon. But is there such a person?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists