linux-kernel - Re: for_each_cpu() is buggy for UP kernel?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180509162027.95ffa21312f7363d13d5ea1e@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 16:20:27 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>,
        "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: for_each_cpu()  is buggy for UP kernel?

On Wed, 9 May 2018 06:24:16 +0000 Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com> wrote:

> In include/linux/cpumask.h, for_each_cpu is defined like this for UP kernel (CONFIG_NR_CPUS=1):
> 
> #define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)                 \
>         for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
> 
> Here 'mask' is ignored, but what if 'mask' contains 0 CPU? -- in this case, the for loop should not
> run at all, but with the current code, we run the loop once with cpu==0.
> 
> I think I'm seeing a bug in my UP kernel that is caused by the buggy for_each_cpu():
> 
> in kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c: tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast(), tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask
> contains 0 CPU, but due to the buggy for_each_cpu(), the variable 'next_event' is changed from
> its default value KTIME_MAX to "next_event = td->evtdev->next_event"; as a result,
> tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast () -> tick_broadcast_set_event() -> clockevents_program_event()
> -> pit_next_event() is programming the PIT timer by accident, causing an interrupt storm of PIT
> interrupts in some way: I'm seeing that the kernel is receiving ~8000 PIT interrupts per second for
> 1~5 minutes when the UP kernel boots, and it looks the kernel hangs, but in 1~5 minutes, finally
> somehow the kernel can recover and boot up fine. But, occasionally, the kernel just hangs there
> forever, receiving ~8000 PIT timers per second. 
> 
> With the below change in kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c, the interrupt storm will go away:
> 
> +#undef for_each_cpu
> +#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)                        \
> +       for ((cpu) = 0; (((cpu) < 1) && ((mask)[0].bits[0] & 1)); (cpu)++, (void)mask)
> 
> Should we fix the for_each_cpu() in include/linux/cpumask.h for UP?

I think so, yes.  That might reveal new peculiarities, but such is life.

I guess we should use bitmap_empty() rather than open-coding it.