Message-ID: <abe98bd822f8c7bab80f9ec9afb34d9b@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Wed, 09 May 2018 12:44:29 +0530
From:   kgunda@...eaurora.org
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 5/5] backlight: qcom-wled: Add auto string detection
 logic

On 2018-05-07 23:40, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 03 May 02:57 PDT 2018, Kiran Gunda wrote:
> 
> [..]
>> +
>> +#define WLED_AUTO_DETECT_OVP_COUNT		5
>> +#define WLED_AUTO_DETECT_CNT_DLY_US		HZ /* 1 second */
>> +static bool wled_auto_detection_required(struct wled *wled)
> 
> So cfg.auto_detection_enabled is set, but we didn't have a fault during
> wled_auto_detection_at_init(), which I presume indicates that the boot
> loader configured the strings appropriately (or didn't enable the BL).
> Then first time we try to enable the backlight we will hit the ovp irq,
> which will  enter here a few times to figure out that the strings are
> incorrectly configured and then we will do the same thing that would
> have been done if we probed with a fault.
> 
> This is convoluted!
> 
> If auto-detection is a feature allowing the developer to omit the 
> string
> configuration then just do the auto detection explicitly in probe when
> the developer did so and then never do it again.
> 
As explained in the previous patch, the auto-detection is needed later,
because are also cases where one/more of the connected LED string of the
display-backlight is malfunctioning (because of damage) and requires the
damaged string to be turned off to prevent the complete panel and/or 
board
from being damaged.
>> +{
>> +	s64 elapsed_time_us;
>> +
>> +	if (*wled->version == WLED_PM8941)
>> +		return false;
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Check if the OVP fault was an occasional one
>> +	 * or if it's firing continuously, the latter qualifies
>> +	 * for an auto-detection check.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!wled->auto_detection_ovp_count) {
>> +		wled->start_ovp_fault_time = ktime_get();
>> +		wled->auto_detection_ovp_count++;
>> +	} else {
>> +		elapsed_time_us = ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(),
>> +						 wled->start_ovp_fault_time);
>> +		if (elapsed_time_us > WLED_AUTO_DETECT_CNT_DLY_US)
>> +			wled->auto_detection_ovp_count = 0;
>> +		else
>> +			wled->auto_detection_ovp_count++;
>> +
>> +		if (wled->auto_detection_ovp_count >=
>> +				WLED_AUTO_DETECT_OVP_COUNT) {
>> +			wled->auto_detection_ovp_count = 0;
>> +			return true;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int wled_auto_detection_at_init(struct wled *wled)
>> +{
>> +	int rc;
>> +	u32 fault_status = 0, rt_status = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (*wled->version == WLED_PM8941)
>> +		return 0;
> 
> cfg.auto_detection_enabled will be false in this case, so there's no
> need for the extra check.
> 
Ok. I will remove it in the next series.
>> +
>> +	if (!wled->cfg.auto_detection_enabled)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	rc = regmap_read(wled->regmap,
>> +			 wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_CTRL_REG_INT_RT_STS,
>> +			 &rt_status);
>> +	if (rc < 0) {
>> +		pr_err("Failed to read RT status rc=%d\n", rc);
>> +		return rc;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	rc = regmap_read(wled->regmap,
>> +			 wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_CTRL_REG_FAULT_STATUS,
>> +			 &fault_status);
>> +	if (rc < 0) {
>> +		pr_err("Failed to read fault status rc=%d\n", rc);
>> +		return rc;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if ((rt_status & WLED3_CTRL_REG_OVP_FAULT_STATUS) ||
>> +	    (fault_status & WLED3_CTRL_REG_OVP_FAULT_BIT)) {
> 
> So this would only happen if the boot loader set an invalid string
> configuration, as we have yet to enable the module here?
> 
Yes.
>> +		mutex_lock(&wled->lock);
>> +		rc = wled_auto_string_detection(wled);
>> +		if (!rc)
>> +			wled->auto_detection_done = true;
>> +		mutex_unlock(&wled->lock);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return rc;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void handle_ovp_fault(struct wled *wled)
>> +{
>> +	if (!wled->cfg.auto_detection_enabled)
> 
> As this is the only reason for requesting the ovp_irq, how about just
> not requesting it in this case?
> 
This is also needed for information purpose if there is any other reason
and also discussing with HW systems what needs to do if the OVP keep on 
triggering.
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&wled->lock);
>> +	if (wled->ovp_irq > 0 && !wled->ovp_irq_disabled) {
> 
> The logic here is unnecessary, the only way handle_ovp_fault() is ever
> executed is if wled_ovp_irq_handler() was called, which is a really 
> good
> indication that ovp_irq is valid and !ovp_irq_disabled. So this is
> always going to be entered.
> 
Ok. I will remove this logic in the next series.
>> +		disable_irq_nosync(wled->ovp_irq);
>> +		wled->ovp_irq_disabled = true;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (wled_auto_detection_required(wled))
>> +		wled_auto_string_detection(wled);
>> +
>> +	if (wled->ovp_irq > 0 && wled->ovp_irq_disabled) {
> 
> Again, ovp_irq is valid and we entered the function with either
> ovp_irq_disabled = true due to some bug or it was set to true above. So
> this check is useless - which renders ovp_irq_disabled unnecessary as
> well.
> 
Ok. I will remove it in the next series.
>> +		enable_irq(wled->ovp_irq);
>> +		wled->ovp_irq_disabled = false;
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&wled->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>  static irqreturn_t wled_ovp_irq_handler(int irq, void *_wled)
>>  {
>>  	struct wled *wled = _wled;
>> @@ -413,6 +706,9 @@ static irqreturn_t wled_ovp_irq_handler(int irq, 
>> void *_wled)
>>  		dev_dbg(wled->dev, "WLED OVP fault detected, int_sts=%x fault_sts= 
>> %x\n",
>>  			int_sts, fault_sts);
>> 
>> +	if (fault_sts & WLED3_CTRL_REG_OVP_FAULT_BIT)
>> +		handle_ovp_fault(wled);
> 
> Just inline handle_ovp_fault() here and make things less "generic".
> 
Sure. Will do it in the next series.
>> +
>>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>  }
>> 
>> @@ -575,6 +871,10 @@ static int wled4_setup(struct wled *wled)
>>  		return rc;
>>  	}
>> 
>> +	rc = wled_auto_detection_at_init(wled);
>> +	if (rc < 0)
>> +		return rc;
>> +
>>  	if (wled->cfg.external_pfet) {
>>  		/* Unlock the secure register access */
>>  		rc = regmap_write(wled->regmap, wled->ctrl_addr +
>> @@ -602,6 +902,7 @@ static int wled4_setup(struct wled *wled)
>>  	.enabled_strings = 0xf,
>>  	.cabc = false,
>>  	.external_pfet = true,
>> +	.auto_detection_enabled = false,
>>  };
>> 
>>  static const u32 wled3_boost_i_limit_values[] = {
>> @@ -785,6 +1086,7 @@ static int wled_configure(struct wled *wled)
>>  		{ "qcom,ext-gen", &cfg->ext_gen, },
>>  		{ "qcom,cabc", &cfg->cabc, },
>>  		{ "qcom,external-pfet", &cfg->external_pfet, },
>> +		{ "qcom,auto-string-detection", &cfg->auto_detection_enabled, },
>>  	};
> 
> So afaict the auto detect logic is triggered by two things:
> 
> * Boot loader enabled backlight with an invalid string configuration,
>   which will make wled_auto_detection_at_init() do the detection.
> 
> * Once we the driver tries to enable the module, ovp faults will start
>   arriving and we will trigger the auto detection.
> 
> But I think you can integrate this in a much more direct way. If the
> module is enabled and there are no faults you should be able to just
> read the config from the hardware (if auto detect is enabled!) and if
> the module is not enabled you can just call auto detect from probe().
> 
> This will give you flicker free "auto detection" in the event that the
> boot loader did its job and very clean logic in the other cases.
> 
Sure. I will improve this logic in the next series.

> Regards,
> Bjorn
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-arm-msm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists