[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509075715.GH711@sol.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 00:57:15 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot <syzbot+148c2885d71194f18d28@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: possible deadlock in vfs_fallocate
[+ashmem maintainers]
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 10:00:03AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> cdface5209349930ae1b51338763c8e029971b97 (Sun Apr 29 03:07:21 2018 +0000)
> Merge tag 'for_linus_stable' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
> syzbot dashboard link:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=148c2885d71194f18d28
>
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?id=5054004375584768
> syzkaller reproducer:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?id=6438048191479808
> Raw console output:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?id=5404215203594240
> Kernel config:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?id=7043958930931867332
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+148c2885d71194f18d28@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> It will help syzbot understand when the bug is fixed. See footer for
> details.
> If you forward the report, please keep this part and the footer.
>
> random: sshd: uninitialized urandom read (32 bytes read)
> random: sshd: uninitialized urandom read (32 bytes read)
> random: sshd: uninitialized urandom read (32 bytes read)
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 4.17.0-rc2+ #23 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor715/4492 is trying to acquire lock:
> (ptrval) (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: file_start_write
> include/linux/fs.h:2718 [inline]
> (ptrval) (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_fallocate+0x5be/0x8d0
> fs/open.c:318
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (ptrval) (ashmem_mutex){+.+.}, at: ashmem_shrink_scan+0xac/0x560
> drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:440
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #3 (ashmem_mutex){+.+.}:
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x16d/0x17f0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
> mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
> ashmem_mmap+0x53/0x460 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:361
> call_mmap include/linux/fs.h:1789 [inline]
> mmap_region+0xd13/0x1820 mm/mmap.c:1723
> do_mmap+0xc79/0x11d0 mm/mmap.c:1494
> do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2237 [inline]
> vm_mmap_pgoff+0x1fb/0x2a0 mm/util.c:357
> ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x4c9/0x640 mm/mmap.c:1544
> __do_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:100 [inline]
> __se_sys_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91 [inline]
> __x64_sys_mmap+0xe9/0x1b0 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:91
> do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #2 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
> __might_fault+0x155/0x1e0 mm/memory.c:4555
> _copy_to_user+0x30/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:25
> copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:155 [inline]
> filldir+0x1ea/0x3a0 fs/readdir.c:196
> dir_emit_dot include/linux/fs.h:3378 [inline]
> dir_emit_dots include/linux/fs.h:3389 [inline]
> dcache_readdir+0x13a/0x620 fs/libfs.c:192
> iterate_dir+0x4b0/0x5d0 fs/readdir.c:51
> __do_sys_getdents fs/readdir.c:231 [inline]
> __se_sys_getdents fs/readdir.c:212 [inline]
> __x64_sys_getdents+0x293/0x4e0 fs/readdir.c:212
> do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){++++}:
> down_write+0x87/0x120 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:70
> inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:713 [inline]
> do_last fs/namei.c:3274 [inline]
> path_openat+0x123b/0x4e20 fs/namei.c:3501
> do_filp_open+0x249/0x350 fs/namei.c:3535
> do_sys_open+0x56f/0x740 fs/open.c:1093
> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1111 [inline]
> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1106 [inline]
> __x64_sys_open+0x7e/0xc0 fs/open.c:1106
> do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> -> #0 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}:
> lock_acquire+0x1dc/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
> percpu_down_read_preempt_disable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:36
> [inline]
> percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:59 [inline]
> __sb_start_write+0x1e9/0x300 fs/super.c:1385
> file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2718 [inline]
> vfs_fallocate+0x5be/0x8d0 fs/open.c:318
> ashmem_shrink_scan+0x1f1/0x560 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:447
> ashmem_ioctl+0x3bf/0x13a0 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:789
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
> file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:500 [inline]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x1cf/0x16a0 fs/ioctl.c:684
> ksys_ioctl+0xa9/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:701
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:708 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:706 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:706
> do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> Chain exists of:
> sb_writers#6 --> &mm->mmap_sem --> ashmem_mutex
>
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(ashmem_mutex);
> lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
> lock(ashmem_mutex);
> lock(sb_writers#6);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syz-executor715/4492:
> #0: (ptrval) (ashmem_mutex){+.+.}, at:
> ashmem_shrink_scan+0xac/0x560 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:440
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 4492 Comm: syz-executor715 Not tainted 4.17.0-rc2+ #23
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
> Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
> dump_stack+0x1b9/0x294 lib/dump_stack.c:113
> print_circular_bug.isra.36.cold.54+0x1bd/0x27d
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1223
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1863 [inline]
> check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1976 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2417 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x343e/0x5140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3431
> lock_acquire+0x1dc/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3920
> percpu_down_read_preempt_disable include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:36 [inline]
> percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:59 [inline]
> __sb_start_write+0x1e9/0x300 fs/super.c:1385
> file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2718 [inline]
> vfs_fallocate+0x5be/0x8d0 fs/open.c:318
> ashmem_shrink_scan+0x1f1/0x560 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:447
> ashmem_ioctl+0x3bf/0x13a0 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:789
> vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:46 [inline]
> file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:500 [inline]
> do_vfs_ioctl+0x1cf/0x16a0 fs/ioctl.c:684
> ksys_ioctl+0xa9/0xd0 fs/ioctl.c:701
> __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:708 [inline]
> __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:706 [inline]
> __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:706
> do_syscall_64+0x1b1/0x800 arch/x86/entry/common.c:287
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> RIP: 0033:0x440179
> RSP: 002b:00007ffc165d4a28 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 6873612f7665642f RCX: 0000000000440179
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000770a RDI: 0000000000000004
> RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00000000004016a0
> R13: 0000000000401730 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> random: crng init done
>
>
> ---
> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> Direct all questions to syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
> If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix for this bug is
> merged
> into any tree, please reply to this email with:
> #syz fix: exact-commit-title
> If you want to test a patch for this bug, please reply with:
> #syz test: git://repo/address.git branch
> and provide the patch inline or as an attachment.
> To mark this as a duplicate of another syzbot report, please reply with:
> #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report
> If it's a one-off invalid bug report, please reply with:
> #syz invalid
> Note: if the crash happens again, it will cause creation of a new bug
> report.
> Note: all commands must start from beginning of the line in the email body.
Looks like yet another locking bug in ashmem. ashmem_mutex normally ranks below
mmap_sem, but ashmem_shrink_scan() inverts that order, via the
file_start_write() in vfs_fallocate().
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists