[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509102646.GO12217@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 12:26:46 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oliver Yang <yangoliver@...com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
xxx xxx <x.qendo@...il.com>,
Taras Kondratiuk <takondra@...co.com>,
Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
Ruslan Ruslichenko <rruslich@...co.com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and
IO
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:01:34PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> +static void psi_clock(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
> + group = container_of(dwork, struct psi_group, clock_work);
> +
> +
> + /* Keep the clock ticking only when there is action */
> + if (nonidle_total)
> + schedule_delayed_work(dwork, MY_LOAD_FREQ);
> +}
Note that this doesn't generate a stable frequency for the callback.
The (nondeterministic) time spend doing the actual work is added to each
period, this gives an unconditional downward bias to the frequency, but
also makes it very unstable.
You want explicit management of timer->expires, and add MY_LOAD_FREQ
(which is a misnomer) to it and not reset it based on jiffies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists