linux-kernel - [PATCH] lib/test_bitmap.c: Fix bitmap optimisation tests to report errors correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180509114328.9887-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Wed,  9 May 2018 21:43:28 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mawilcox@...rosoft.com,
        ynorov@...iumnetworks.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_bitmap.c: Fix bitmap optimisation tests to report errors correctly

From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>

I had neglected to increment the error counter when the tests failed,
which made the tests noisy when they fail, but not actually return an
error code.

Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Fixes: 3cc78125a081 ("lib/test_bitmap.c: add optimisation tests")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.13+
Tested-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
---
 lib/test_bitmap.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

We noticed this a while back but the patch got lost.

Andrew are you happy to take it?

cheers


diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index de16f7869fb1..6cd7d0740005 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -331,23 +331,32 @@ static void noinline __init test_mem_optimisations(void)
 	unsigned int start, nbits;
 
 	for (start = 0; start < 1024; start += 8) {
-		memset(bmap1, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap1));
-		memset(bmap2, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap2));
 		for (nbits = 0; nbits < 1024 - start; nbits += 8) {
+			memset(bmap1, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap1));
+			memset(bmap2, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap2));
+
 			bitmap_set(bmap1, start, nbits);
 			__bitmap_set(bmap2, start, nbits);
-			if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+			if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
 				printk("set not equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
-			if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+				failed_tests++;
+			}
+			if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
 				printk("set not __equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
+				failed_tests++;
+			}
 
 			bitmap_clear(bmap1, start, nbits);
 			__bitmap_clear(bmap2, start, nbits);
-			if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+			if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
 				printk("clear not equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
-			if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+				failed_tests++;
+			}
+			if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
 				printk("clear not __equal %d %d\n", start,
 									nbits);
+				failed_tests++;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.14.1