lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509120917.xz3ggtloq523wqzh@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 08:09:17 -0400
From:   Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <tobin@...orbit.com>
Cc:     Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux NetDev Upstream Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netfilter Devel List <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Security Module list 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Integrity Measurement Architecture 
        <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        SElinux list <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ghak81 RFC V1 4/5] audit: use inline function to set
 audit context

On 2018-05-09 12:07, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:54:37PM -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Recognizing that the audit context is an internal audit value, use an
> > access function to set the audit context pointer for the task
> > rather than reaching directly into the task struct to set it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/audit.h | 8 ++++++++
> >  kernel/auditsc.c      | 6 +++---
> >  kernel/fork.c         | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
> > index 93e4c61..dba0d45 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/audit.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
> > @@ -235,6 +235,10 @@ extern void __audit_inode_child(struct inode *parent,
> >  extern void __audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code);
> >  extern void __audit_ptrace(struct task_struct *t);
> >  
> > +static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
> > +{
> > +	task->audit_context = ctx;
> > +}
> >  static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(struct task_struct *task)
> >  {
> >  	return task->audit_context;
> > @@ -472,6 +476,10 @@ static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void)
> >  {
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> > +static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
> > +{
> > +	task->audit_context = ctx;
> > +}
> 
> If audit_context is an internal audit value why do we set it when
> CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL is not set?

Agreed, that is unnecessary, but harmless since it won't be called, or
will be called with a value of NULL.  That has been fixed in my dynamic
allocation patchset since not even the audit_task_info struct is
available to assign the value.  It is now an empty function like the
rest.

> Tobin.

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ