[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509142221.0fef7d1f@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 14:22:21 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] mtd: rawnand.h: use nested union kernel-doc
markups
On Wed, 9 May 2018 09:10:34 -0300
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> Em Mon, 7 May 2018 08:32:32 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> escreveu:
>
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > Em Mon, 7 May 2018 11:46:50 +0200
> > Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> escreveu:
>
> > > Is there a simple
> > > way we can get rid of the warning we have when not describing timings
> > > but all of its fields?
> >
> > There's no direct way. It won't be hard to add a way to do it,
> > like applying the enclosed patch with ends by declaring timings as:
> >
> > * @timings: -- undescribed --
> >
> > IMHO, this is uglier.
>
> Didn't hear from you.
I replied just a few minutes ago ;).
> What do you prefer for me to do with regards to
> this patch?
Will queue the initial patch to nand/next (I can also queue it to the
fixes branch if you prefer).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists