[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509013935.GA8131@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 18:39:35 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: provide a fallback for PAGE_KERNEL_RO for
architectures
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 01:04:38AM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 08:18:10PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > ia64: Add PAGE_KERNEL_RO and PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC
> >
> > The rest of the kernel was falling back to simple PAGE_KERNEL pages; using
> > PAGE_KERNEL_RO and PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC provide better protection against
> > unintended writes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
>
> Nice, should I queue this into my series as well?
A little reluctant to queue it without anyone having tested it. Heck,
I didn't even check it compiled ;-)
We used to just break architectures and let them fix it up for this kind
of thing. That's not really acceptable nowadays, but I don't know how
we get arch maintainers to fix up their ports now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists