linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ppc64le livepatch: implement reliable stacktrace for newer consistency models

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180509001432.5nd55ictwf5yi7sm@treble>
Date:   Tue, 8 May 2018 19:14:32 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ppc64le livepatch: implement reliable stacktrace for
 newer consistency models

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:38:32AM +0200, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> On Mon, 7 May 2018 10:42:08 -0500
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > The subject doesn't actively describe what the patch does, maybe
> > change it to something like:
> > 
> >   powerpc: Add support for HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE
> > 
> > or maybe
> > 
> >   powerpc: Add support for livepatch consistency model
> 
> Maybe $SUBJECT? You're absolutely right, the old subject was just a
> leftover of my original attempt to just set the flag, before Miroslav
> corrected me. I just kept on copying it without a second thought. Thanks
> for noting.

Generally we refer to it as "the consistency model".  So I would
propose a minor edit:

  ppc64le/livepatch: Implement reliable stack tracing for the consistency model

> > Otherwise it looks great to me.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> > 
> Thanks.
> 
> 	Torsten
> 

-- 
Josh