[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180509135706.GB98604@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 06:57:06 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OMAP serial runtime PM and autosuspend (was: Re: [PATCH 4/7]
dt-bindings: gnss: add u-blox binding))
* Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> [180509 13:12]:
> While this seems to fix the idling of closed ports here too, I'm not
> sure we can move use_autosuspend to startup() like this.
>
> First, this flag should be set before registering the tty so that udev
> can be used to update the attributes.
>
> Second, this prevents setting the autosuspend delay through sysfs when
> the port is closed (when autosuspend is disabled).
Yeah I noticed that too yesterday.
> It seems we really should not be using the negative autosuspend to
> configure the RPM behaviour the way these drivers do. Perhaps a new
> mechanism is needed.
Hmm well simply defaulting to "on" instead of "auto" and setting the
autosuspend_ms to 3000 by default might be doable. I think that way
we can keep use_autosuspend() in probe. Let's hope there are no
existing use cases that would break with that.
> But I'm afraid I don't have time to look at this today.
Sure np thanks,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists