[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9992abe5-57e6-4c2c-601d-fead7e441696@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 11:38:11 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+e8b902c3c3fadf0a9dba@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Petar Penkov <peterpenkov96@...il.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic in tun_do_read
On 2018年05月09日 10:50, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 05/07/2018 10:54 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> Yeah, we should return early before hitting this uninitialized ptr ring...
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
>>> index ef33950a45d9..638c87a95247 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
>>> @@ -2128,6 +2128,9 @@ static void *tun_ring_recv(struct tun_file
>>> *tfile, int noblock, int *err)
>>> void *ptr = NULL;
>>> int error = 0;
>>>
>>> + if (!tfile->tx_ring.queue)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>>
>>> Or, checking if tun is detached...
>>>
>>>
>> tx_ring was properly initialized when first ptr_ring_consume() at line 2131 was attempted.
>>
>> The bug happens later at line 2143 , after a schedule() call, line 2155
>>
>> So a single check at function prologue wont solve the case the thread had to sleep,
>> then some uninit happened.
>
> Very good point. RTNL lock is supposed to protect cleanup path, but I don't
> think we can acquire RTNL for tun_chr_read_iter() path...
I think the root cause is we try to initialize ptr ring during TUNSETIFF
since the length depends on the dev->tx_queue_len and try to destroy it
when device is gone. We can solve this by initializing a zero size
ptr_ring during open() and resize if necessary. Then there no need for
any workaround like memset and checking against NULL.
Let me try to cook a patch for this.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists