linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180509213528.54bad29b@bbrezillon>
Date:   Wed, 9 May 2018 21:35:28 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, "w@....eu" <w@....eu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org" 
        <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] bug-introducing patches

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:47:27 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 May 2018 18:03:46 +0900 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:47:57AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:  
> > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:    
> >   
> > > > I think this is an excellent idea, copying in Stephen for his input.
> > > > I'm currently on holiday but unless someone convinces me it's a terrible
> > > > idea I'm willing to at least give it a go on a trial basis once I'm back
> > > > home.    
> >   
> > > Since Stephen merges all -fixes branches first, before merging all the
> > > -next branches, he already generates that as part of linux-next. All
> > > he'd need to do is push that intermediate state out to some
> > > linux-fixes branch for consumption by test bots.  
> 
> Good idea ... I will see what I can do.
>   
> > True.  It's currently only those -fixes branches that people have asked
> > him to merge separately which isn't as big a proportion of trees as have
> > them (perhaps fortunately given people's enthusiasm for fixes branches
> > that don't merge cleanly with their development branches) so we'd also
> > need to encourage people to add them separately.  
> 
> I currently have 44 such fixes branches.  More welcome!

I see that the nand/fixes and spi-nor/fixes branch are already there [1].
You can add:

mtd-fixes	git	git://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git#master

You can also remove the mtd entry [2], since mtd-2.6.git is just a sym
link to linux-mtd.git, so it will just be a duplicate of the mtd-fixes
entry. You can also rename the l2-mtd entry [3] into mtd.

Regards,

Boris

[1]https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next/+/43cd1f4979998ba0ef1c0b8e1c5d23d2de5ab172/Next/Trees#41
[2]https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next/+/43cd1f4979998ba0ef1c0b8e1c5d23d2de5ab172/Next/Trees#155
[3]https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next/+/43cd1f4979998ba0ef1c0b8e1c5d23d2de5ab172/Next/Trees#156