[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180509194658.29106-2-peda@axentia.se>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 21:46:58 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: robotfuzz-osif: drop pointless test
In the for-loop test, ret will be either 0 or 1. So, the
comparison is pointless. Drop it, and drop the initializer
which is then also pointless.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
index 51d93b4b00f2..d848cf515234 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-robotfuzz-osif.c
@@ -62,10 +62,10 @@ static int osif_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, struct i2c_msg *msgs,
{
struct osif_priv *priv = adapter->algo_data;
struct i2c_msg *pmsg;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
int i;
- for (i = 0; ret >= 0 && i < num; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
pmsg = &msgs[i];
if (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists